< ? law blogs # >
Report from Counsel
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
 

Monday, January 22, 2007

Clutter misery                http://ohioriverlife.blogspot.com/

by Liz Lundberg
I went back home to spend the New Year's Day and Dad's birthday with my parents. Normally I wouldn't write about the same stuff, but since I "broke the story" about finding an old copy of the Pledge of Allegiance, I thought I might follow up with a tale about cleaning my mother's closet.

First of all, you need to know that my mom is a clutter bug. I won't say she is the worst clutter bug in the world, because she has not died beneath her litter. But she's not dead yet, so time will tell. She sends five bucks to every charity that asks for money, and in order to keep her on the money pipeline, they send her note cards, calendars, address labels, envelope seals, rosaries, medallions, refrigerator photo frames, magnets, prayers and other assorted bric-a-brac.

Someday when the last hose is finally exhausted and the insurance company declares the house a total loss, my mother will heed our words about the firetrap she inhabits, but in the meantime, I offered to help her organize this mountain of clutter. She suggested we begin organizing the bathroom instead. Well, it's a start, I thought, so up we went to the loo.

We discovered a bottle of Wheat Germ Oil & Honey Shampoo from the seventies and a jar of Vaseline from the sixties. I was a teenager when it was new! I asked her if maybe we could try selling it on eBay with the suggestion that the form of the Virgin and child had been gouged into it and had remained unmolested for over twenty years. "Sure enough, there's her head, mom!" I exclaimed. She laughed and laughed. "OK, so toss?" "No, your father can use it to lubricate things." She set the petroleum aside.

There was a lot of used BIC razors, some of which we (I) tossed. "Most," directed mom, were "still good," so back they went into the pile of razors. There was a literal cornucopia of miniature motel shampoos and conditioners. Some were used. The bottles had many different shapes. The pettiest ones had pink fluid in them and were from the Grosvenor Hotel in the U.K., but they had been opened, and the fluid had turned off-pink to yellow around the upper edge. I said, "No good, toss." To which she countered, "But once they're empty we might need the bottles."

There had to be thirty bottles sitting in front of me. I don't think my 76-year-old mom and my 82-year-old dad can travel enough to get rid of all the bottles they have, much less need the empties anytime before they die. This fact never crossed her mind. Like the banker who tried to sell my grandmother a sixteen year CD when she was 92: What was he thinking?

We managed to separate the full bottles from the empty ones and place the full ones in a pretty box with some other attractive soaps and lotions—for when guests come. We agreed to place the used ones in a box to go to the rummage sale. Nobody will use the remaining soap in these bottles, but maybe they would empty them to use as travel bottles themselves. That way, I thought, they're at least almost out of the house. There were two other bottles that I admit I was hoping we'd keep. They contained, respectively, tincture of merthiolate and dose of castor oil. Both looked as though they might have been carried by Florence Nightingale.

This was merely the episode of the bottles. Over the course of this adventure together, we had numerous episodes and discussions about each and every item we pulled from under the sink and over the sink. We simplified the arrangement this junk, although most of the junk that would never be used again somehow survived. For example, there were pieces of soap so hard that they could repel water. We should have given those to dad to fix the roof with, but like mom says "soap is soap," and we had to keep every chip and chunk of that shale.

At the end of all the episodes—of the bottles, Band-Aids, gauze, sample packs, floss, thermometers (three more than have been used in the last ten years, even though we 'thought we only had one') eye drops, boric acid, Bacitracin (remember Bacitracin?) cream and assorted pain killers—we had reduced the volume by a whopping one tenth.

Had this been my project I would have shut my eyes and tossed all of it out except the Band-Aids, those two refugee bottles from Charlie Company, and the unopened hotel bottles. It's always easier to throw away somebody else's stuff, but by then I was contemplating burning down my own house and beginning anew—especially knowing that I carry the gene for clutter mania. The whole thing had ceased to be funny. It was now morbid.

Imagine going home only to discover that you can't sit next to your mother on the couch because three fourths of it is blanketed in newspapers, magazines, lists, date books, fiction, nonfiction, crossword puzzles, knitting needles, yarn, and a pair of socks with holes in the heels and toes. You might feel a bit unwelcome. I know it's not her intention, but the silent communication is: "You're welcome, but not welcome enough for me to actually make space for you here." My parents' house has more books, more fountains of wisdom than the Library of Congress, but there's literally no place to sit down and read. Needless to say, they rarely entertain.

Mom's computer is in her "shop"—a used book store that supplies major outlets like Abe Books and Amazon. This store, too, is packed six high and two deep with books. To use the computer you have to squeeze in between a Yertle the Turtle tower and a box. The tiny space hollowed out of the work area for the mouse is almost too small to fit your hand, let alone to move the mouse. The bookcases are stacked high with heavy hardbacks, and I fear someday having dig out my buried and broken mother from beneath these shelves. That she has osteoporosis improves the possibility.

There must be twenty of those two-handled tote bags lining the entryway when you walk in the front door of the bookshop. For a year mom couldn't find her digital camera. I moved one of the tote bags. It was underneath. This is what I'm talking about, but there is a great deal of emotion tied up in all of this stuff. For me it represents anger and hostility. We love mom and we hate her. There isn't anything we can do about it, but to hear my father say, "When she dies I'm having a bonfire," I wonder if it's a celebration he's secretly hoping for. I had always thought of my parents as an inseparable couple, a wonderful team perpetually in love. We never saw them angry at each other when we were kids. But in this one compulsion of Mom's I see the sinister destruction of their devotion.

The only truly thriving inhabitants of the house are the plants and the fruit flies that circle like a living carousel above a bowl of rotting fruit. This will not do for me. I cannot stand the feeling that my beautiful parents are going to be buried with animosity between them instead of tranquil earth, or that their ashes will cause toxic waste because of her contempt and his anger. I want to fix this before it's too late.

The pile-up is not all her fault. My father shoulders the burden of his own martyrdom. The end of every sentence is followed by a description of a limiting factor linked to the words "your mother." The truth is that she's not his limiting factor; he is.. But as long as he blames her, nothing can change. His beautiful house remains a fire trap and an obstacle course. And he remains the ineffectual patsy, unable (or unwilling) to save his wife for her own sake.

The psychological part comes from growing up in the Great Depression, she says. Their house was small. One had only a corner in which to place her precious few books, papers and toys. She loves the idea that she now has infinite space to put everything. She loves the infinite ownership, too. She's a clutter miser.

Why keep all this stuff? Why not give it all to the needy, like the good Christian she works so hard to be? Well, it might be worth something someday. Deep inside, her unwillingness to let go of this dubious wealth is a fear of not having enough, that someday this will be needed, like Judgment Day. You know it's coming, and must be prepared. But that's something beyond reality. Clutter is not good for the psyche. At some point, the psychological need to "unload" one's physical detritus (and all the emotions linked to it) should kick in against the defenses of clutter misery.

Mom isn't any different than smokers with respect to addiction, except it's a different type of coffin nail. I see her in myself clearly at times, so I know what I am talking about; it saps our life energy. It's only visible in her case if one visits the house. Instead, at her advanced age, she has remedied that by always going out and never having guests. She's off on her lay ministry, ministering to the locals with her lay minister friends, while dad stays home and watches the beast.


 

Links to this post:

<\$BlogItemBacklinkCreate\$>

Wednesday, November 29, 2006
  r guehl (robert.guehl@gmail.com) has sent you a news story from EurekAlert!

"Tibetan chic: Why Buddhism is so hot right now"
http://www2.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-04/ra-tcw041906.php

___________________________________________________________

This message was sent from EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS,
the science society.

Visit http://www.eurekalert.org for more breaking science,
health and technology news.

 

Links to this post:

<\$BlogItemBacklinkCreate\$>

Tuesday, September 19, 2006
 
FROM OpinionJournal:
 
The Washington Post's Anne Applebaum weighs in with a very sensible comment on the kerfuffle over the pope and Islam:

We can all unite in our support for freedom of speech--surely the pope is allowed to quote from medieval texts--and of the press. And we can also unite, loudly, in our condemnation of violent, unprovoked attacks on churches, embassies and elderly nuns. By "we" I mean here the White House, the Vatican, the German Greens, the French Foreign Ministry, NATO, Greenpeace, Le Monde and Fox News--Western institutions of the left, the right and everything in between.

True, these principles sound pretty elementary--"we're pro-free speech and anti-gratuitous violence"--but in the days since the pope's sermon, I don't feel that I've heard them defended in anything like a unanimous chorus.

 

Links to this post:

<\$BlogItemBacklinkCreate\$>

Friday, March 24, 2006
 

from OpinionJournal -

Addendum: But They Support the Troops!
The Christian Peacemaker Teams, whose appallingly ungrateful statement about the military rescue of three of their colleagues in Iraq we noted yesterday, last night added a new section called "Addenda," which includes this:

We have been so overwhelmed and overjoyed to have Jim, Harmeet and Norman freed, that we have not adequately thanked the people involved with freeing them, nor remembered those still in captivity. So we offer these paragraphs as the first of several addenda:

We are grateful to the soldiers who risked their lives to free Jim, Norman and Harmeet. As peacemakers who hold firm to our commitment to nonviolence, we are also deeply grateful that they fired no shots to free our colleagues.

Yesterday's Orlando Sentinel, published before the hostages' release, carried a letter to the editor from CPT's Kathleen Kern, which reinforces the argument we made yesterday, namely that CPT views America as the root of all evil:

I am writing as a grieving colleague of Tom Fox in response to Cal Thomas' March 14 column, "The Tom Fox tragedy."

We do not believe that "evil people will be nice to us if we are nice to them." We do believe that Jesus meant what he said when he told his followers, "But love your enemies, do good and lend, expecting nothing in return. Your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High; for he is kind to the ungrateful and the wicked." (Luke 6:35)

Christian Peacemaker Teams agrees with Cal Thomas when he says, "Evil cannot be accommodated. Evil must be defeated if peace on Earth is to exist."

We strive with all our might to fight the evil that says it is acceptable to bomb and torture people, that some lives are worth more than others, that we can ignore what Jesus said about treating "the least of these" as we would treat him.

But a reader who asks to remain anonymous says their theology can be more easily explained than we did:

It does not "equate America as the root of all evil and America's adversaries as Edenic creatures--innocents who know not good or evil and thus bear no culpability for their bad actions." Instead, it stems from the view that we are not morally responsible for our enemy's acts but for our own, and that the good Christian suffers all manner of evil (lest his love for his neighbor be stained) when it is that good Christian's own welfare that is at stake, but suffers no manner of evil to befall his neighbor when yet another neighbor would commit harm against him.

The application of this traditional Christian moral viewpoint leads to turning the other cheek in some purely self-regarding situations, and to the use of force in other-regarding situations. To the outsider, Christian "just war" theory is easily caricatured as an inconsistent waffling between "pacifism" and "bellicism," but in fact it is neither.

In the present case, the CPT seems to have concluded that Christian love requires turning the other cheek always. ("Just war pacifism" is not unknown in the history of Christian ethics.) This is a kind of rejection of responsibility for the neighbor who is unjustly harmed by yet another neighbor, or of the possibility that using force will prevent a greater evil. But it is not as strange as you make it out to be

 

Links to this post:

<\$BlogItemBacklinkCreate\$>

Wednesday, March 15, 2006
 

Theodore Roosevelt's ideas on Immigrants and being an AMERICAN in 1907:

"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here
in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be
treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to
discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or
origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an
American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance
here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an
American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have
room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we
have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American
people."

"Learn as if you were going to live forever. Live as if you were going to
die tomorrow." - Mahatma Gandhi

 

Links to this post:

<\$BlogItemBacklinkCreate\$>

 
 
 

Use of Implanted Patient-Data Chips Stirs Debate on Medicine vs. Privacy

Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, March 15, 2006; Page A01

When Daniel Hickey's doctor suggested he have a microchip implanted under his skin to provide instant access to his computerized medical record, the 77-year-old retired naval officer immediately agreed.

"If you're unconscious and end up in the emergency room, they won't know anything about you," Hickey said. "With this, they can find out everything they need to know right away and treat you better

Add FUN to your email - CLICK HERE!
 

Links to this post:

<\$BlogItemBacklinkCreate\$>

Tuesday, March 14, 2006
 

Best of the Web Today - March 14, 2006 Opinion Journal - Wall Street Journal
editorial page
By JAMES TARANTO

Torturing the News--II
Yesterday we noted that the New York Times had published a page 1 story on
Abu Ghraib on the same day that it published a story on page 8 about the
murder of a hostage, who, as the Times reported the next day on page 10, was
apparently tortured before being slain. Today the Times reports its Abu
Ghraib story may have been fake:

The online magazine Salon is challenging the identity of a man profiled by
The New York Times in a front-page article on Saturday who says he is the
iconic hooded figure in a published photograph who was abused by Americans
at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003 and 2004.

Salon bases its challenge on an examination of a set of 280 Abu Ghraib
photographs it has been studying for several weeks and an interview with an
official of the Army's Criminal Investigation Command, known as the C.I.D.,
who says the man identified by The Times is not the detainee in the
photograph.

On Monday, Chris Grey, chief spokesman for the investigations unit, asked
about the challenge, confirmed to The Times in an e-mail message: "We have
had several detainees claim they were the person depicted in the photograph
in question. Our investigation indicates that the person you have is not the
detainee who was depicted in the photograph released in connection with the
Abu Ghraib investigation.

The story raising doubts about the page 1 story appeared on page 17.

 

Links to this post:

<\$BlogItemBacklinkCreate\$>

Wednesday, March 08, 2006
 


Best of the Web Today - March 8, 2006 URL for this article:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110008061
By JAMES TARANTO

What's for Desert?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-03-07-deserters_x.htm
The U.S. military's desertion rate "has plunged since the Sept. 11 attacks
in 2001," USA Today reports:

The Army, Navy and Air Force reported 7,978 desertions in 2001, compared
with 3,456 in 2005. The Marine Corps showed 1,603 Marines in desertion
status in 2001. That had declined by 148 in 2005.

The desertion rate was much higher during the Vietnam era. The Army saw
a high of 33,094 deserters in 1971--3.4% of the Army force. But there was a
draft and the active-duty force was 2.7 million.

Desertions in 2005 represent 0.24% of the 1.4 million U.S. forces.

Accompanying the story is a chart that shows Army desertions have declined
every year since 2001.

So how does USA package this good news for the military? As bad news: The
headline reads "8,000 Desert During Iraq War," and the first paragraph
begins:

At least 8,000 members of the all-volunteer U.S. military have deserted
since the Iraq war began, Pentagon records show, although . . .

Many in the press seem determined to follow their Iraq-as-Vietnam script,
whether or not it's consistent with the facts.

 

Links to this post:

<\$BlogItemBacklinkCreate\$>

 
 
 

[Editor's Note: Below are selected excerpts from Brigitte Gabriel's speech delivered at the Intelligence Summit in Washington DC, Saturday February 18, 2006].

We gather here today to share information and knowledge. Intelligence is not merely cold hard data about numerical strength or armament or disposition of military forces. The most important element of intelligence has to be understanding the mindset and intention of the enemy. The West has been wallowing in a state of ignorance and denial for thirty years as Muslim extremist perpetrated evil against innocent victims in the name of Allah.

I was ten years old when my home exploded around me, burying me under the rubble and leaving me to drink my blood to survive, as the perpetrators shouted “Allah Akbar!” My only crime was that I was a Christian living in a Christian town. At 10 years old, I learned the meaning of the word "infidel."

I had a crash course in survival. Not in the Girl Scouts, but in a bomb shelter where I lived for seven years in pitch darkness, freezing cold, drinking stale water and eating grass to live. At the age of 13 I dressed in my burial clothes going to bed at night, waiting to be slaughtered. By the age of 20, I had buried most of my friends--killed by Muslims. We were not Americans living in New York, or Britons in London. We were Arab Christians living in Lebanon.

As a victim of Islamic terror, I was amazed when I saw Americans waking up on September 12, 2001, and asking themselves "Why do they hate us?" The psychoanalyst experts were coming up with all sort of excuses as to what did we do to offend the Muslim World. But if America and the West were paying attention to the Middle East they would not have had to ask the question. Simply put, they hate us because we are defined in their eyes by one simple word: "infidels."

Under the banner of Islam "la, ilaha illa allah, muhammad rasoulu allah," (None is god except Allah; Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah) they murdered Jewish children in Israel, massacred Christians in Lebanon, killed Copts in Egypt, Assyrians in Syria, Hindus in India, and expelled almost 900,000 Jews from Muslim lands. We Middle Eastern infidels paid the price then. Now infidels worldwide are paying the price for indifference and shortsightedness.

Tolerating evil is a crime. Appeasing murderers doesn't buy protection. It earns one disrespect and loathing in the enemy's eyes. Yet apathy is the weapon by which the West is committing suicide. Political correctness forms the shackles around our ankles, by which Islamists are leading us to our demise.

America and the West are doomed to failure in this war unless they stand up and identify the real enemy: Islam. You hear about Wahabbi and Salafi Islam as the only extreme form of Islam. All the other Muslims, supposedly, are wonderful moderates. Closer to the truth are the pictures of the irrational eruption of violence in reaction to the cartoons of Mohammed printed by a Danish newspaper. From burning embassies, to calls to butcher those who mock Islam, to warnings that the West be prepared for another holocaust, those pictures have given us a glimpse into the real face of the enemy. News pictures and video of these events represent a canvas of hate decorated by different nationalities who share one common ideology of hate, bigotry and intolerance derived from one source: authentic Islam. An Islam that is awakening from centuries of slumber to re-ignite its wrath against the infidel and dominate the world. An Islam which has declared "Intifada" on the West.

America and the West can no longer afford to lay in their lazy state of overweight ignorance. The consequences of this mental disease are starting to attack the body, and if they don't take the necessary steps now to control it, death will be knocking soon. If you want to understand the nature of the enemy we face, visualize a tapestry of snakes. They slither and they hiss, and they would eat each other alive, but they will unite in a hideous mass to achieve their common goal of imposing Islam on the world.

This is the ugly face of the enemy we are fighting. We are fighting a powerful ideology that is capable of altering basic human instincts. An ideology that can turn a mother into a launching pad of death. A perfect example is a recently elected Hamas official in the Palestinian Territories who raves in heavenly joy about sending her three sons to death and offering the ones who are still alive for the cause. It is an ideology that is capable of offering highly educated individuals such as doctors and lawyers far more joy in attaining death than any respect and stature, life in society is ever capable of giving them.

The United States has been a prime target for radical Islamic hatred and terror. Every Friday, mosques in the Middle East ring with shrill prayers and monotonous chants calling death, destruction and damnation down on America and its people. The radical Islamists’ deeds have been as vile as their words. Since the Iran hostage crisis, more than three thousand Americans have died in a terror campaign almost unprecedented in its calculated cruelty along with thousands of other citizens worldwide. Even the Nazis did not turn their own children into human bombs, and then rejoice at their deaths as well the deaths of their victims. This intentional, indiscriminate and wholesale murder of innocent American citizens is justified and glorified in the name of Islam.

America cannot effectively defend itself in this war unless and until the American people understand the nature of the enemy that we face. Even after 9/11 there are those who say that we must “engage” our terrorist enemies, that we must “address their grievances”. Their grievance is our freedom of religion. Their grievance is our freedom of speech. Their grievance is our democratic process where the rule of law comes from the voices of many not that of just one prophet. It is the respect we instill in our children towards all religions. It is the equality we grant each other as human beings sharing a planet and striving to make the world a better place for all humanity. Their grievance is the kindness and respect a man shows a woman, the justice we practice as equals under the law, and the mercy we grant our enemy. Their grievance cannot be answered by an apology for who or what we are.

Our mediocre attitude of not confronting Islamic forces of bigotry and hatred wherever they raised their ugly head in the last 30 years, has empowered and strengthened our enemy to launch a full scale attack on the very freedoms we cherish in their effort to impose their values and way of life on our civilization.

If we don't wake up and challenge our Muslim community to take action against the terrorists within it, if we don't believe in ourselves as Americans and in the standards we should hold every patriotic American to, we are going to pay a price for our delusion. For the sake of our children and our country, we must wake up and take action. In the face of a torrent of hateful invective and terrorist murder, America’s learning curve since the Iran hostage crisis is so shallow that it is almost flat. The longer we lay supine, the more difficult it will be to stand erect.

 

Links to this post:

<\$BlogItemBacklinkCreate\$>

Robert Guehl,JD,LLM, practices in Salem Ohio. Civil litigation, personal injury and insurance claims, and small business advisory. Ohio State Univ. College of Law (JD 1973);the National Law Center, Geo. Washington Univ.(LLM, 1979);Fellow,Forensic Medicine at the Armed Forces Inst. of Pathology, Walter Reed Army Med. Center. Offices at 217 N. Lincoln Avenue, Salem, OH 44460. Tel (800) 628-8989, Fax (330) 337-9520 EMAIL Attorney@GuehlLaw.com WEBSITE: GuehlLaw.com

ARCHIVES
02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 / 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 / 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 / 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 / 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 / 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 / 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 / 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 / 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 / 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 / 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 / 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 / 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 / 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 / 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 / 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 / 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 / 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 / 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 / 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 / 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 / 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 / 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 / 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 / 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006 / 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006 / 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007 / links to this post


Powered by Blogger

Site Meter